Анкета для мусульман желающих получить гражданство США: различия между версиями

Перейти к навигации Перейти к поиску

Анкета для мусульман желающих получить гражданство США (посмотреть исходный код)

Версия от 20:01, 27 марта 2013

362 байта добавлено ,  27 марта 2013
нет описания правки
[досмотренная версия][досмотренная версия]
Нет описания правки
Нет описания правки
Строка 59: Строка 59:
'''(6) Hate speech is objectionable in American culture, and federal law regards such language as legally actionable, deserving punishment. While there are various categories of hate speech, general agreement is that anti-Semitism is the worst such offense.'''  
'''(6) Hate speech is objectionable in American culture, and federal law regards such language as legally actionable, deserving punishment. While there are various categories of hate speech, general agreement is that anti-Semitism is the worst such offense.'''  


{{cite quran|5|60|end=65|style=ref}} says in part, speaking specifically of Jews as verse 59 makes clear: "Those whom God has cursed and with whom He has been angry,  he has transformed them into apes and pigs, and those who serve the devil" This is the source of Muslim demonstrators' signs and chants that Jews are apes and pigs --the Qur'an itself. There are still other passages in Muhammad's book  which also are anti-Semitic --as the term is generally used in America  to refer to anti-Jewish bigotry.
{{Коран|5|60|65}} says in part, speaking specifically of Jews as verse 59 makes clear: "Those whom God has cursed and with whom He has been angry,  he has transformed them into apes and pigs, and those who serve the devil" This is the source of Muslim demonstrators' signs and chants that Jews are apes and pigs --the Qur'an itself. There are still other passages in Muhammad's book  which also are anti-Semitic --as the term is generally used in America  to refer to anti-Jewish bigotry.


'''Do you repudiate all anti-Semitic hate speech in the Qur'an, especially verse 60 of Surah 5?''' '''YES / NO'''  
'''Do you repudiate all anti-Semitic hate speech in the Qur'an, especially verse 60 of Surah 5?''' '''YES / NO'''  
Строка 67: Строка 67:




'''(7) War or any acts of physical violence, or threat of violence, with the intention of forcing people to convert to a religion is utterly abhorrent to American law and is explicitly outlawed by the First Amendment.'''  
'''(7) Акты насилия или угрозы насилия, с целью заставить людей перейти в какую либо религию отвратительны и запрещены американским законом. '''  


{{Quran|8|12}} "Thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Muslims, I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Smite them on their necks and cut all their fingers off."  
{{Quran|8|12}} "Вот внушил Господь твой ангелам: Я - с вами, укрепите тех, которые уверовали! Я брошу в сердца тех, которые не веровали, страх; бейте же их по шеям, бейте их по всем пальцам!"  


This is one of 164 jihad verses in Muhammad's book. Of this number approximately 100 are commandments to able-bodied Muslim men to physically fight against non-Muslims. The remaining 64 verses deal with inner struggle, etc, and are not the subject here.  
Это один из 164-х аятов джихада. Из этого числа около 100 аятов призывают вести физическую борьбу против не-мусульман. Остальные 64 аята относятся к внутренней борьбе и не являются предметом нашего рассмотрения.


Generations of Muslim authorities leave zero room to doubt that war or other forms of physical violence on behalf of Islam, with the objective being forced conversion  of non-Muslims, is commanded and is not an option. In most cases the "cover"  --rationalization-- for such aggression is the pretext that these should be defensive campaigns.  Except that, from the outset, while Muhammad was still alive and a leader in jihad, few if any jihads were defensive at all and were only claimed to be, because Muslims  were offended that other people would not willingly surrender to their armies when invaded.  That is, there is no reasonable doubt that the meaning of the 100 jihad verses in question  all promote violence against people of other faiths. The main objective is conversion but also important is terrorizing others so that they fear the wrath of Muslims.
Generations of Muslim authorities leave zero room to doubt that war or other forms of physical violence on behalf of Islam, with the objective being forced conversion  of non-Muslims, is commanded and is not an option. In most cases the "cover"  --rationalization-- for such aggression is the pretext that these should be defensive campaigns.  Except that, from the outset, while Muhammad was still alive and a leader in jihad, few if any jihads were defensive at all and were only claimed to be, because Muslims  were offended that other people would not willingly surrender to their armies when invaded.  That is, there is no reasonable doubt that the meaning of the 100 jihad verses in question  all promote violence against people of other faiths. The main objective is conversion but also important is terrorizing others so that they fear the wrath of Muslims.


'''Do you repudiate all jihad verses in the Qur'an which command Muslims to fight against non-Muslims with the objective of converting other people to Islam?''' '''YES / NO'''  
'''Готовы ли вы отказаться от всех аятов джихада, которые призывают мусульман воевать против людей других религий, чтобы заставить их принять ислам?''' '''ДА/НЕТ'''  




Источник — http://ru.wikiislam.net/wiki/Служебная:Сравнение_версий/320

Навигация